EMA Risk Management approach for COVID-19 vaccines

Further to the recent good news regarding the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine candidates, European Authorities have published new guidance documents to support Risk Management activities for these vaccines once they are authorised.

    ⇒    Link to EMA News Release

Photo by Daniel Schludi on Unsplash

CoreRMP19 requirements and guidance

This includes a new guidance document published by the EMA to help companies prepare the Risk Management Plan (RMP) for their COVID-19 vaccines, which complements the existing GVP Guidelines and the associated RMP template. This document covers specific considerations for COVID-19 vaccines, including:

• The submission by MAHs of Summary Monthly Safety Reports to the EMA, to complement PSURs. As detailed within the guidance, these reports should include interval and cumulative summary tabulations of ADR reports, exposure data, ongoing and closed signals, etc.
• The need to adapt signal detection methods and practices to the expected large volume of ADR reports in the context of vaccination campaigns during a pandemic
• The need to consider global efforts to define the list of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
• The need to consider the use of specific Follow-up Questionnaires for reports of identified safety concerns and suspected AESIs, while the burden on healthcare professionals should remain limited
• The need to consider missing information for specific populations, including pregnant women, patients with co-morbidities, elderly and children

   ⇒    Direct link to Core RMP guidance for COVID-19 vaccines

Please Note that a revision of the above guidance was published on 15-Jun-2021.

Photo by CDC on Unsplash

Pharmacovigilance Plan of the EU Regulatory Network

European Authorities have also produced a Safety Monitoring Plan for COVID-19 vaccines, which outlines how they intend to collect and review all relevant information once COVID-19 vaccines get authorised.

In addition to the EU GVPs, several activities will apply specifically to COVID-19 vaccines. As described above, this includes new reporting obligations for companies, who will be required to submit Summary Monthly Safety Reports to the EMA.

Transparency is an important theme of the plan, and it details the exceptional measures set up by the EMA to support public confidence and promote the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines. As an example, the EMA will publish on its website the full body of the RMP for all authorised COVID-19 vaccines, including Annex 4 presenting specific ADR follow-up forms.

    ⇒    Direct link to Pharmacovigilance Plan of the EU Regulatory Network

_______________________________________

Thierry Hamard is a Pharmacist with more than 15 years of Global Pharmacovigilance Auditing experience and over 200 PV Audits performed since his company PV Focus was established in 2004.

Thierry is also Chief Editor of Safety Observer, a provider of Regulatory Intelligence services for Pharmacovigilance since 2005.

Established products to exit EU list of Black Triangle Products ?

As reported in Safety Observer N°148 of September 2018, the EMA has published the minutes of the 100th Management Board meeting, which took place on 06 and 07-Jun-2018.

The Board discussed a great variety of topics, including Brexit and lessons learnt after the first EMA Public Hearing. It also included a discussion on a report exploring the experience made with the list of products subject to additional monitoring, also known as the list of Black Triangle Products.

As described in GVP Module X, all medicines on the list must be identified with an inverted Black Triangle, which is displayed in their package leaflet and in the SmPC. This system was derived from the Black Triangle scheme already in place in the UK to highlight the medicines under close scrutiny by the authorities, which was expanded throughout Europe with the implementation of the 2010 Pharmacovigilance Legislation. The EMA published the list for the first time in April 2013 and it is reviewed every month by the PRAC.

There are a few reasons that can make a medicine enter the list, knowing that it should remain on the list for 5 years unless the PRAC decides otherwise:

• It contains a new active substance or a new biological/biosimilar product

• It has been given a conditional approval, or approved under exceptional circumstances or with specific obligations on the recording of suspected ADRs

• The company that markets the medicine is required to conduct a post-authorisation safety study (PASS)

One of the main conclusions of the report discussed by the Board is that the latter criterion has led to the inclusion of a large number of established products in the list (see item B.9 in the minutes). This is reportedly of limited value and the PRAC supports that this category of products should be removed from the scope of additional monitoring.

Based on the current list (i.e. Revision 58 dated 25-Jul-2018), there are 57 out of 346 active substances that are on the list only because of a required PASS. They are not all established products but those are easy to spot because the number of products and MAHs concerned is so large that they need to be presented in Annexes separate to the list. For example, the list of Domperidone-containing medicinal products (Annex X) is 6 pages long. Even though each formulation / MAH / Country is presented, it still concerns a large number of products indeed.

Based on the report and the opinion of the PRAC Committee, this may change in the future and these products would no longer qualify for the Black Triangle scheme in the EU. Following endorsement by the Heads of Medicines Agencies (HMA), the report will be sent to the European Commission for further consideration and decision by the European Parliament and Council.

→       Link to EMA Management Board Meeting Page

→       Direct link to EMA Management Board 100th Meeting Minutes

→       Link to EMA Page: Medicines under additional monitoring

→       Link to EMA Page: List of medicines under additional monitoring

Thierry Hamard is a Pharmacist with more than 15 years of Global Pharmacovigilance Auditing experience and over 200 PV Audits performed since his company PV Focus was established in 2004.

Thierry is also Chief Editor of Safety Observer, a provider of Regulatory Intelligence services for Pharmacovigilance since 2005.

EMA Guidance on ICSR data from EudraVigilance

Everybody should know by now but in case you missed it, the EMA published much-awaited guidance over the summer to clarify the obligations of MAHs to record information on ICSRs they can access in EudraVigilance.

Since the implementation of the New EudraVigilance on 22-Nov-2017, MAHs are given access to all ICSRs contained in the EudraVigilance database. The MAHs are now responsible to access EudraVigilance to retrieve all ICSRs related to their medicines and first received by National Authorities.

There was however no guidance regarding the obligations of MAHs in relation to ICSRs submitted to EudraVigilance by other MAHs or regarding those ICSRs available in EudraVigilance prior to 22-Nov-2017. This has caused a lot of pain and confusion, especially for MAHs of generic products who could not exclude ownership of the suspected products in many ICSRs they became aware of.

This gap has now been closed by the EMA and the Note for Clarification published on 23-Jul-2018 brings much needed guidance:

• Regarding the ICSRs available in EudraVigilance prior to 22-Nov-2017, the Note clarifies that MAHs have no obligation to screen EudraVigilance for cases that they do not already have in their own database. In the same way, the MAH have no obligation to record in their database those ICSRs they become aware through activities related to Signal Management in EudraVigilance.

• Regarding the ICSRs submitted by other MAHs to EudraVigilance, the Note clarifies that MAHs have no obligation to record these in their own database.

Although some will argue this took a long time and could have been better anticipated, this should come as a relief for the industry. It also sets a clear standard for Regulatory Inspections.

→ Link to EMA Page: Access to EudraVigilance data

→ Direct link to Note for Clarification

Thierry Hamard is a Pharmacist with more than 15 years of Global Pharmacovigilance Auditing experience and over 200 PV Audits performed since his company PVFocus was established in 2004.

Thierry is also Chief Editor of Safety Observer, a provider of Regulatory Intelligence services for Pharmacovigilance since 2005.

EMA Signal Detection Pilot and New MAs…

The Signal Detection Pilot started on 22-Feb-2018 and concerned MAHs are now required to monitor EudraVigilance data and inform Authorities of validated signals detected in the database. Only those MAHs whose active substances are included in the list of products involved in the pilot are subject to these new requirements.

In March 2018, we published the response we received from the EMA to a question we asked regarding the possible addition of New Active Substances to the list. We were wondering whether the new requirements would apply to companies who get a new substance approved while the pilot is ongoing but the EMA confirmed that the list of substances involved in the pilot is fixed and will not change (link to our March 2018 post here).

Anna Marques, EU QPPV at Eignapharma (link to their website here), was wondering about another scenario: What if you get a new Marketing Authorisation for a product that is already in the list, for instance if you register a new generic product ?

That’s also an interesting question and I would like to thank Anna for accepting to share the response she received from the EMA, which states that the new requirements do not apply to products that became authorised after the start of the pilot. Anna’s exchange with the EMA is available in a comment to our March 2018 post (link to our March 2018 post here).

In conclusion, only companies that were MAHs for products included in the list at the beginning of the pilot are concerned by the new Signal Detection requirements and this will not change during the pilot. I hope this helps !

Thierry Hamard is a Pharmacist with more than 15 years of Global Pharmacovigilance Auditing experience and over 200 PV Audits performed since his company PVFocus was established in 2004.

Thierry is also Chief Editor of Safety Observer, a provider of Regulatory Intelligence services for Pharmacovigilance since 2005.

EMA Signal Detection Pilot and New Active Substances…

As everyone knows, the New EudraVigilance System was implemented on 22-Nov-2017 and brings enhanced Signal Detection and Data Analysis tools to support safety monitoring directly by MAHs.

As described in the latest revision of GVP Module IX on Signal Management, Marketing Authorisation Holders (MAHs) have a requirement to continuously monitor EudraVigilance data and inform EMA and National Competent Authorities of validated signals detected in the database.

Transitional arrangements have however been agreed in order to streamline the implementation of this new process and during a pilot period of one year starting on 22-Feb-2018, only those MAHs whose active substances are included in the list of products involved in the pilot will be subject to the new requirements.

The list of substances involved in the pilot was first published by the EMA on 27-Oct-2017 and was last corrected on 14-Feb-2018 (Link to EMA Signal Management Page Here).

As initially communicated by the EMA, the list of substances involved in the pilot is based on the list of medicines under additional monitoring in the EU, i.e. the list of Black Triangle Products, which is revised on a monthly basis by the EMA (Link to EMA List of Medicines Under Additional Monitoring Here). And this made us wonder…

Can products be added to the list during the Pilot ?

I have worked for a Start-Up company recently which is awaiting its first Marketing Authorisation in Europe. As the product is a new active substance, it will obviously be added to the list of Black Triangle Products and so we were wondering whether the product will also be added to the list of substances involved in the Signal Detection pilot.

I tried to find the response to this question in the information available on the EMA website but I could not find what I was looking for. And so I sent my question to the EMA.

EMA Says No !

I was pleased to receive a conclusive response within a day, and the EMA confirmed that the list of substances involved in the pilot is fixed and will not change over the duration of the pilot.

I don’t know if many people also wondered about this but I hope this is helpful. I believe the EMA has since removed any reference to the list of Black Triangle Products for the avoidance of doubt.

Here is a copy of the exchange I had with the EMA:

I wonder if you could clarify this for me : I know that the list of products for the Signal Detection pilot is based on the list of products under additional monitoring. If a new product is approved over the next year, it will go to the list of Black Triangle products but what about the Signal Detection pilot ? Will the list of products for the pilot be revised on an on-going basis or is fixed for the year to come ? Many thanks in advance.

Re: EMA request reference ASK-39482

Dear Mr Hamard,

Thank you for your query.

We confirm that the pilot list is fixed i.e. it will not be affected by changes to the additional monitoring list (additions or deletions).

Best regards,

European Medicines Agency

Thierry Hamard is a Pharmacist with more than 12 years of Global Pharmacovigilance Auditing experience and over 200 PV Audits performed since his company PVFocus was established in 2004.

Thierry is also Chief Editor of Safety Observer, a provider of Regulatory Intelligence services for Pharmacovigilance since 2005.

EMA issues go-live plan for the new EudraVigilance

The implementation of the new EudraVigilance system requires the migration of more than 11 million cases from the current database, which will be completed from 08 to 21-Nov-2017 when some functionalities of the system will be unavailable. The electronic submissions of data on medicines (Article 57) will be unavailable whereas the electronic reporting of ICSRs by National Competent Authorities (NCAs), Marketing Authorisation Holders (MAHs) and Sponsors of Clinical Trials (Sponsors) will be disrupted.

The go-live plan published by the EMA describes the alternative reporting arrangements during the cutover period, and three options are presented separately for Clinical Trial SUSARs and Post-marketing ICSRs:

• Option 1: The submission is stopped. This applies to EudraVigilance but also to a list of NCAs, some of which will stop sending/receiving cases as early as 04-Nov-2017.
• Option 2: The MAH/Sponsor has to follow alternative arrangements (e.g. fax or email) for submission to NCAs during the cutover period.
• Option 3: No change to current arrangements. The MAH/Sponsor continues with the electronic submission of NCAs, which applies in the UK (MHRA) and Germany (BfArM and PEI). Specifically for SUSARs, Option 3 also applies to NCAs that do not currently accept E2B reports (e.g. France) and Sponsors should continue with the current reporting method (e.g. email or web portal).

Following the launch of the new EudraVigilance system on 22-Nov-2017, all reports that could not be submitted electronically during the cutover period will need to be submitted within 2 EMA business days following the go-live of EudraVigilance, i.e. by 24-Nov-2017.

Regarding Post-Marketing ICSRs routinely sent by NCAs to MAHs, the MAHs will need to use EVWEB functionalities to download the reports submitted by NCAs to EudraVigilance and the corresponding ICSRs will be available for download as of 23-Nov-2017.

The Medical literature monitoring (MLM) by the EMA will continue during the cutover period but the screening results will only become available to MAHs in the restricted area of EudraVigilance on 22-Nov-2017. The resulting valid cases will be entered from 20 to 30-Nov-2017 and the corresponding ICSRs will again start to become available for download by MAHs as of 23-Nov-2017.

In addition to the go-live plan, the EMA has published a short Technical Note that describes the impact of the planned downtime on other IT systems and provides corresponding instructions. This concerns for example submission to the PSUR Repository and EudraCT database.

→    Link to EMA News Release

→    Link to EudraVigilance Page

→    Direct link to EudraVigilance Go-Live Plan

→    Direct link to Technical Note

Thierry Hamard is a Pharmacist with more than 12 years of Global Pharmacovigilance Auditing experience and over 200 PV Audits performed since his company PV Focus was established in 2004.

Thierry is also Chief Editor of Safety Observer, a provider of Regulatory Intelligence services for Pharmacovigilance since 2005.